![coreduotemp service macos coreduotemp service macos](https://www.mac-v.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/MN-Medal-of-Honor-Memorial.png)
#COREDUOTEMP SERVICE MACOS DRIVER#
sure beats the 97% score for my 1ghz 12" powerbook.Ģ) Laptop/Desktop? Make/Model - Mac Book ProĤ) CPU Make Model and Speed - Dual Core Intel 2.0ghzĦ) Soundcard - ASIO driver on MOTU UltraliteĢ) Laptop/Desktop? Make/Model - Apple MacBook ProĤ) CPU Make Model and Speed - Intel Core Duo 2ghzĥ) Amount of Ram / Speed of Ram - 2GB DDR2 667mhzħ) Hard Disk Drive Speed - 7200RPM Internal it might make a bigger difference on sets with a larger cpu load. I haven't tested much else yet with the speed stepping extension removed. Without speed stepping extension removed:
#COREDUOTEMP SERVICE MACOS INSTALL#
kext file but upon booting, i get a message saying I did not install it properly. however, when running another test alongside a 2.1ghz G5 in which the G5's processor workload was 80-83%, the core duo barely broke the 55% mark!!!! Throttling is your friend, if you're a core duo owner. Look at it like this: when running the test WITH the extension, it performs the same as a 2.1ghz G5, because the OS sees that more performance is not necessary at that workload. In all honesty, for core duo owners, the live 5 performance test doesnt mean shit, thanks to the CPU throttling. the coreduotemp CPU strain did not surpass 21%. With the kext deleted, the idle clock speed is 1.66ghz, and remains constant, regardless of the processor workload. tempertures in the range of 68-81 degrees, based on workload. average clock speed thru live 5 test was between 1.33 and 1.5ghz. With the kernal extension in place, the CPU clock speed fluctuates, based on the need for higher CPU clock speed. I wonder how far I can push this!!! sweet My G5 1.8 with 1.0 gb of ram got around 55-60% and really wanted to choke. I can browse and cruise aroud the OS and it never goes above 40%. This is my numbers without editing anything to enhance performance. I don't own a macbook & don't have enough knowledge to comment on the speedstepping thing - if anyone wants to summarise how it affects these figures, please do so. These figures might be a little out of context for the following reasons:ġ) Live 5 doesn't use both processors (waiting for Live 6)Ģ) "speedstepping" and how it works on the new laptops (much discussed on the forum - see ".kext file" & xbench) Page numbers refer to the relevant page on the Performance thread & thanks to everyone who supplied their results Performance details on new macs, taken from the Live 5 performance test: I did this for my own purposes, thought it might be useful to others.